ReviewJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Biomarkers of Reversible and Irreversible Pulpitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Postoperative pain after emergency pulpectomy with or without photobiomodulation in symptomatic irreversible pulpitis A randomized clinical trial.Scientific reports · 2026Trial
- Effect of Er, Cr: YSGG laser-activated final irrigation on gingival crevicular fluid RANKL/OPG levels.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Spatial Transcriptomics Delineates the Inflammatory Landscape of Human Dental Pulp: Regional Crosstalk and Therapeutic Implications.International endodontic journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify biomarkers that could enhance the accuracy of diagnosing reversible and irreversible pulpitis. This systematic review was conducted in adherence to the guidelines outlined in PRISMA. A total of twelve studies were included for analysis. A meta-analysis of nine studies showed an overall effect of 9.91 with a
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.