Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40511175›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

Jeswin Abel, G Ranjitha, N Lingesh Kumar, Mahesh F Balikai, Ayushi Singh, Arya Jayavarma

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jeswin AbelSenior Lecturer, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sree Mookambika Institute of Dental Sciences, V. P. M. Hospital Complex, Padanilam, Kulasekharam, Kanyakumari, Tamil Nadu, India.
G RanjithaDepartment of Orthodontics, M. R. Ambedkar Dental College and Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
N Lingesh KumarDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Priyadarshini Dental College and Hospital, Pandur, Tiruvallur, Tamil Nadu, India.
Mahesh F BalikaiAssistant Professor, Department of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Subbaiah Institute of Dental Sciences, Shimoga, Karnataka, India.
Ayushi SinghDepartment of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Sardar Patel Post Graduate Institute of Dental and Medical Sciences, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Arya JayavarmaAssociate Therapist, MDS (ortho), P.hd, Smart Dental Care, England.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Correcting malocclusions with controlled dental displacement is one of the objectives of orthodontic treatment. Materials and Methods: Over time, the two main treatment choices that have surfaced are the transparent aligners and the traditional braces. Results: This work explores the efficacy of clear aligners and conventional braces in terms of tooth movement, biomechanical features, and patient-centered outcomes using an Conclusion: By means of movement correctness, velocity, and prospective consequences, the study offers a whole knowledge of the benefits and drawbacks connected with every therapy modality.

Indexed as

Clear alignersconventional bracketsroot resorption

Identifiers

PMID40511175
PMCPMC12156766

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.