ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Delving Relationship between Head Circumference and Maxillary Anterior Teeth Dimensions.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To explore the association between the head circumference and maxillary anterior teeth dimensions. Materials and Method: A total of 150 subjects, evenly divided between males and females, were randomly selected for the evaluation of craniometric and odontometric measurements. The measurements were taken using a non-stretchable measuring tape and a sliding digital stainless-steel Vernier caliper. The statistical analyses included One-way ANOVA, correlation, and linear regression analysis. The confidence level of 95%, was determined with a Results: Males exhibited a larger average head circumference than females, indicating a highly statistically significant gender dimorphism in cranial circumference. Additionally, males demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the mean combined mesio-distal width of maxillary anterior teeth when compared to females. The Pearson correlation test revealed a weak negative correlation for males, while a weak positive correlation was observed for females and the combined data. Conclusion: The findings of the study did not reveal a significant correlation; however, they may serve as foundational data for future research involving a larger sample size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.