Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40511132›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

Comparison of Apical Sealing Ability of Different Endodontic Sealers - An

Supriya Patil, Rahul Singh, B Jyothi Lekshmi, Sameer Ahmed Khan, H Shalini, Prashanth Kumar Katta

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Supriya PatilDepartment of Conservative and Endodontics, H. K. E. S. Nigalingappa Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Kalaburgi, Karnataka, India.
Rahul SinghDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sarjug Dental College and Hospital, Darbhanga, Bihar, India.
B Jyothi LekshmiDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, PMS College of Dental Science and Research, Vattapara, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India.
Sameer Ahmed KhanDepartment of Conservative and Endodontics, Kothiwal Dental College and Research Centre, Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh, India.
H ShaliniDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Balaji Dental College, Pallikaranai, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Prashanth Kumar KattaDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, College of Dentistry, King Faisal University, Al Ahsa, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study compares the apical sealing ability of Apexit Plus, Diaproseal, and AH Plus when used with lateral compaction of gutta-percha. Materials and Methods: Forty-five extracted human teeth were divided into three groups ( Results: There was no significant difference in apical dye leakage between the three groups. Group I (Apexit Plus) had a mean leakage of 0.502 mm, Group II (Diaproseal) had 0.499 mm, and Group III (AH Plus) had 0.504 mm ( Conclusion: All the groups demonstrated comparable apical sealing abilities, suggesting that each is an effective choice for root canal obturation.

Indexed as

AH PlusApexit Plusapical sealingDiaproseallateral compactionroot canal obturation

Identifiers

PMID40511132
PMCPMC12156695

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.