ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Evaluation of Root Canal Obturation Bond Strength Following 2-Week Coronal Seal Loss and Thermal and Chewing Cycling:
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of two weeks of thermal and chewing cycling (T&C) on the adhesion of three endodontic sealers-AH Plus (AHP), EndoSequence BC (BC), and AH plus bioceramic (AHPBC)-using the push-out bond strength test. Materials and Methods: Eighty single-rooted mandibular premolars were selected, disinfected, and prepared using ProTaper Gold rotary files up to size F4. The samples were randomly divided into eight groups based on obturation technique and sealer type. The sealer types AHP, BC, and AHPBC were used with either the single cone or the continuous wave techniques. After obturation, the samples underwent thermal and chewing cycling (T and C) for 2 weeks consisting of 400 cycles of thermocycles (15°C-45°C) and 9,500 chewing cycles (30-50N). The parameters of push-out bond strength were measured, while the failure modes were evaluated under a stereomicroscope. Results: The obtained results from the push-out bond strength test showed significant differences between sealers and techniques of obturation. In the coronal third, bond strength was the highest, while the middle and apical thirds followed. Continuous wave AHP with no T and C demonstrated the highest bond strength with 19.97 ± 10.54 MPa in the apical third. In contrast, AHPBC with T and C had the lowest bond strength in all sections. T and C had an unfavorable effect on the bond strength of AHP and AHPBC. However, T and C with BC showed improved adhesion. Conclusions: Thermal and chewing cycling (T and C) significantly influenced the adhesion of endodontic sealers. AHP and AHPBC demonstrated reduced bond strength after T and C, while BC showed improved performance. These findings suggest that long-term clinical success may be influenced by the choice of sealer and obturation technique in conditions simulating coronal seal loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.