ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Comparative Outcomes of Different Surgical Techniques for the Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Impacted mandibular third molar removal is a common oral surgery procedure, often associated with postoperative complications. The choice of surgical technique may influence outcomes such as pain, swelling, and healing time. This study aims to compare different surgical techniques to evaluate their impact on clinical outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing impacted mandibular third molar removal was conducted. Three techniques were evaluated: traditional rotary instruments, piezosurgery, and laser-assisted surgery. Postoperative outcomes, including pain, edema, and healing time, were recorded. Results: Patients who underwent piezosurgery reported significantly less postoperative pain and swelling compared to those treated with rotary instruments. Laser-assisted surgery showed a comparable reduction in pain but extended healing time. Conclusion: Piezosurgery is the most favorable technique in terms of minimizing postoperative discomfort and swelling, while laser-assisted surgery may be beneficial in certain clinical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.