ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Evaluating Shear Bond Strength of Different Glass Ionomer Cements to Dentin: An Experimental Study.
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The study aimed to estimate the shear bond strength (SBS) of various glass ionomer cements (GICs). Materials and Methods: Forty-eight extracted premolars were divided into 12 each groups after doing coronal sectioning 1 mm under the junction of enamel and dentin (DEJ) at perpendicular to the long axis of the tooth by utilizing a diamond disc at low speed and implanted into acrylic blocks of measuring 2 cm × 2 cm: Group 1: Conventional GIC (GC Gold Label 2, Japan), Group 2: Resin Modified GIC (GC Gold Label 2 LC, Japan), Group 3: Zirconia Reinforced GIC (Shofu Zirconomer Improved, Japan), and Group 4: Hydroxyapatite Modified GIC (Prevest Crysta Bioactive, India). Following the company's directions, the experimental materials were bonded to the samples using a plastic cylinder template. The specimens were incubated for a day at 37°C in artificial saliva. Last, the universal tester machine with a stainless-steel (SS) knife at a speed of 0.5 mm/min, which was positioned perpendicular to the junction that connected the material and dentin, was used to perform the shear bond test (SBS) until debonding and measured in Mega Pascals (MPa). One-way ANOVA was used to analyze the data. Results: Associating mean SBS (MPa) among the groups showed a higher mean associated with group 3, followed by group 4, group 2, and then group 1, with a statistically significant difference. Conclusion: The Zirconia Reinforced GIC showed the highest mean SBS than other different modifications of GIC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.