ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Comparative Analysis of Physicocomechanical Properties of MTA and Biodentine with Addition of Graphene Oxide to MTA and Biodentine: An
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modifications of Biodentine and Their Influence on Endodontic Properties: A Scoping Review.International journal of dentistry · 2026Review
- Graphene and Related Materials: Properties and Applications in Dentistry.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The comparison of physicochemical and bioactivity properties of different nanoparticles modified calcium silicate-based cement.BMC oral health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Bioactive calcium silicate cements (CSCs), such as Mineral Trioxide Aggregate (MTA) and Biodentine, are widely used in endodontic procedures to repair and regenerate tooth pulp and hard tissues. They are valued for being biocompatible, sealing well, and promoting tissue growth. However, they have limitations, like long setting times and weaker bond strength. Graphene oxide, a 2D carbon nanomaterial with exceptional physical and chemical properties, has shown potential in biomedical applications. Aims and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of adding 1% graphene oxide to MTA and Biodentine on their setting time and push-out bond strength. This study tested whether adding 1% graphene oxide to MTA and Biodentine could improve their properties. Materials and Methods: 40 samples were divided into four groups: regular MTA, MTA with graphene oxide (MTAG), regular Biodentine (BD), and Biodentine with graphene oxide (BDG). Setting time, push out bond strength were measured. Results: Results showed that MTAG and BDG set faster and had stronger push out bonds than regular MTA and BD. Conclusion: These findings suggest graphene oxide could enhance CSCs, making them more effective for dental procedures like pulp capping and perforation repair.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.