Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40511022›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025

Impact of Intra-Oral Dental Materials on Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Perspective Survey from Dental Professionals.

Sejal Gupta, Mathangi Kumar, Kalyana C Pentapati, Ravindranath Vineetha, Vinu Thomas George, Nidambur Vasudev Ballal, Priya Pattath Sankaran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sejal GuptaColumbia University College of Dental Medicine, New York, United States of America.
Mathangi KumarDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Kalyana C PentapatiDepartment of Public Health Dentistry, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Ravindranath VineethaDepartment of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Vinu Thomas GeorgeDepartment of Prosthodontics and Crown & Bridge, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Nidambur Vasudev BallalDepartment of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Manipal College of Dental Sciences, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.
Priya Pattath SankaranDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim and Background: This study aimed to assess the awareness of dental practitioners about the impact of various intra-oral dental materials on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: This cross-sectional questionnaire survey was conducted on dental graduates, postgraduates, and faculty who were provided with a validated self-administered questionnaire to assess their knowledge about various materials on MRI. Information regarding the interactions of these materials was classified under three categories: heat generation, mechanical vibration, and artifact production. A consensus panel of six experts from various specialties of dentistry and radiodiagnosis framed a specially designed closed-ended questionnaire over two phases. Knowledge scores were calculated based on the respondent scores. The comparison of mean knowledge scores was done using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: Overall, 200 dental professionals participated in the study; 85.5% of the participants were aware that dental materials could interfere with MRI. Most of the participants felt that stainless-steel materials were least compatible whereas composites were most compatible with MRI. Conclusion: This study showed limited knowledge regarding the interference of dental materials in MRI. A material safety information card should be provided by the manufacturer that can be used to document the patient dental records. Clinical Significance: Continuing dental education programs should focus on educating dental professionals and reducing knowledge gaps. A material safety information card should be provided by the manufacturer for the materials that are used.

Indexed as

Artifactsdental materialsmagnetic resonance imaging

Identifiers

PMID40511022
PMCPMC12156492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.