ArticleJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences2025
Article in Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Collagen Scaffolds in Regenerative Endodontic Procedures: Current Evidence, Limitations, and Future Perspectives.Polymers · 2026Review
- Biological impact of adding albumin and silver nanoparticles to concentrated growth factors.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Frozen advanced platelet-rich fibrin as an adjunct to the modified tunnel technique for root coverage: A pilot randomised clinical trial.Journal of Indian Society of PeriodontologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: The present study sought to assess, using growth factor release and tissue integration, the Materials and Methods: The control was commercially available collagen membranes; PRF membranes were produced using a normal centrifugation technique. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to examine structural features. Key growth factors-including transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-β1), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF-BB), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA). Using scratch tests, we assessed wound healing capacity and fibroblast migration. The student's Results: While collagen membranes showed a consistent porosity shape, PRF showed a rich fibrin network, including embedded platelets and leukocytes. At 14 days, PRF showed much more cell growth ( Conclusion: These results suggest that PRF might be a more effective biomaterial for use in guided tissue regeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.