ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
The association between network literacy and subjective well-being among middle-aged and older adults.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Effect of network literacy on depression levels among young adults: an analysis based on China Family Panel Studies].Zhejiang da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Zhejiang University. Medical sciences · 2026Article
- The Dual Impact of Smartphone App Usage Diversity on Quality of Life: The Moderating Roles of Age and Digital Literacy.European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education · 2025Article
- The association between subjective socioeconomic status and depressive symptoms in women of reproductive age: the chain mediating effects of marital satisfaction and well-being.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- The negative association between health status and digital health literacy among Chinese youth: a cross-sectional study on Chinese general social survey.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: With the advent of the digital age, network literacy has become a pivotal indicator for assessing the social adaptability and quality of life among middle-aged and older adults. Methods: This study is based on data from the Chinese Family Panel Studies (CFPS), utilizing three waves of data from 2014, 2018, and 2020. We employ a fixed-effects panel regression and Bootstrap method to explore the association between network literacy and subjective well-being of this demographic and its mediating mechanisms. Results: The research findings indicate a significant positive correlation between network literacy and subjective well-being among middle-aged and older adults, with both network usage literacy and network perception literacy positively promoting their subjective well-being. Interpersonal relationships play a positive mediating role between network literacy and subjective well-being. Furthermore, the frequency of online social interaction and entertainment in network usage literacy, as well as the importance of these activities in network perception literacy, have significant positive relationships with subjective well-being. Conclusion: These findings underscore the importance of enhancing network literacy among middle-aged and older adults, providing a foundation for policymakers and community organizations to facilitate their integration into the digital society. This integration can enable them to enjoy the Internet's convenience and entertainment, thereby improving their quality of life and well-being. Future research should extend its focus to the multidimensional aspects of network literacy and its enduring effects on the well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.