ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Detecting depression in speech using verbal behavior analysis: a cross-cultural study.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Language analysis has proven to be a reliable methodology for discriminating depressed people from healthy subjects; the present study investigates differences in the linguistic content of spoken interactions from depressed and healthy subjects belonging to three different European areas: Northern Ireland, Italy, and Russia. Method: The speech of 241 participants (65 native English speakers, 108 native Italian speakers, and 68 native Russian speakers) was analyzed, using the computerized text analysis tool LIWC (Linguistic Inquiry Word Count). Results: In line with the current literature, it was observed that depressed subjects tended to use more first-person singular pronouns, speak less, use a more negative tone while speaking and use more words related to negative emotions and anxiety compared to healthy controls. Our study also highlighted some innovative findings, such as depressed subjects' greater spontaneity and tendency to speak with less self-censorship compared to healthy participants, as well as a tendency to adopt a type of thinking defined as "informal" rather than analytic. Moreover, our study is the first, at least to the best of our knowledge, comparing speech content of depressed participants belonging to three European areas: Western Europe (Northern Ireland), Southern Europe (Italy) and Eastern Europe (Russia). Conclusions: Data collected through the present study could be useful in providing guidelines for the design of autonomous systems able to detect early signs of mood changes and depression through the analysis of interactional exchanges. The final aim is to provide automated and cost-effective technological interventions to be used in health care centers, as well as by mental health professionals, such as psychologists, psychiatrists, psychotherapists, therefore with the aim to provide assistance, jointly with the clinician's expertise, in the process of diagnosing depression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.