ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Bridging consciousness and AI: ChatGPT-assisted phenomenological analysis.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the brain: a computational MRI-derived neurophysiological framework for robotic conscious capacity.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Mixed-method studies require adaptation to the era of big data in quantitative research, seeking scalable approaches that can analyze extensive qualitative datasets while preserving the depth and nuance inherent in the study of consciousness on a broader scale. Objective: This study aimed to leverage ChatGPT, renowned for its descriptive generation proficiency, to perform a phenomenological analysis. Methodology: Our research followed four key stages: (1) Preparation of Phenomenological Data, where transcriptions were refined to align with the research question; (2) Individual Analysis, where ChatGPT highlighted experiential nuances from each participant; (3) Global Analysis, synthesizing insights from individual narratives temporally and transversally; and (4) Structure of the Experience, which synthesized the elemental components of shared experiences. Custom prompts, tailored for each stage, ensured alignment and precision in capturing the experience dimensions. Results: ChatGPT showcased a sophisticated processing capability of human experiences, effectively organizing themes that reflect the intensity of sensations and variations in empathetic encounters. The tool's proficiency in thematic organization provided a phenomenologically-grounded processing of data, highlighting how individuals engage with and are affected by stimuli. Discussion: Our findings highlight ChatGPT's potential in consciousness studies, transforming raw input into detailed phenomenological accounts. ChatGPT combines precision with scalability, making it a compelling tool for researchers exploring the intricacies of human experiences. Further research is essential to better understand AI's capacity in phenomenological analysis and to strengthen the methodological framework, ensuring it effectively captures the nuances and depth of phenomenological inquiry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.