ArticleEClinicalMedicine2025
Modelling the potential financial impacts of expanding access to immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy for treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Endobronchial Intratumoral Immuno- and Gene Therapies in Lung Cancer: Mechanisms of Local Delivery, Systemic Immune Effects, and Global Feasibility.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Immune-Checkpoint-Inhibitor-Related Cardiovascular Toxicities in Cancer: A Mechanistic Review of Molecular Pathways with AI-Assisted Literature Clustering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Risk stratification of PD-L1 expression in non-small cell lung cancer: a predictive model for prognosis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- The evolution of cancer therapies and their Implications for health technology assessment in Australia.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2026Review
- MFAP4 promotes cell prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer through the inhibition of ferroptosis by FAK.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2026Article
- Reported drug spectrum and disproportionality signals for malignant neoplasm progression in FAERS: a real-world pharmacovigilance study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Biomarker-driven neoadjuvant immunotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer: emerging therapeutic targets FOXP3 and WT1.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Immunotherapy in Asia: current insights and prospects in Southeast Asia and Malaysia.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Optimizing PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy for driver mutation-negative non-squamous NSCLC in China: a cost-effectiveness analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Next-generation oncology: integrative therapeutic frontiers at the crossroads of precision genomics, immuno-engineering, and tumor microenvironment modulation.Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England) · 2025Review
- Immunometabolism in cancer: a systemic perspective.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Access to immune checkpoint inhibitors remains limited due to cost-effectiveness and affordability concerns. This study evaluates the financial impacts of expanding global access to PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line monotherapy for patients aged 40-74 years with advanced unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with wildtype EGFR and ≥50% of tumour cells with PD-L1 expression. Methods: The potential usage and associated costs were assessed from 2024 to 2040 through repeated cross-sectional assessments. The base case assumed treatment rates in countries with access to PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors in 2023, while expanded-access scenarios projected coverage increases to 30% in low-income, 50% in lower-middle-income, 80% in upper-middle-income (UMICs), and 95% in high-income countries over 10 years. Findings: The model estimated that 200,000-250,000 individuals are treatment-eligible, with only about one-fifth receiving PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the base case. Expanding access would increase global treatment coverage to 75% by 2040, particularly in middle-income countries. The largest increases would be in UMICs (+100,700) and the Western Pacific region (+82,400). At an estimated per-patient lifetime cost of US$37,600-US$75,100, total costs could reach US$14,087 million with fixed dosing, or US$9080 million with weight-based dosing. PD-L1 testing costs would add <1% to the total. Interpretation: Expanding access to PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced NSCLC over 10 years demands significant funding, making equitable access in lower-income countries doubtful without a significant price reduction. Policymakers should negotiate lower prices to ensure cost-effectiveness and affordability, improve spending efficiency by optimised dosing and treatment duration, and enhance health system capacity, including ensuring appropriate use and introducing biosimilars. Funding: This publication was made available as open access through WHO funding provided by two projects: the Universal Health Coverage Partnership (Award 74812, the European Union, the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg, Irish Aid, the Government of Japan, the French Ministry for Europe and Foreign Affairs, the United Kingdom's Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office, the Government of Belgium, the Government of Canada, and the Government of Germany) and the Increasing Global Equitable Access to Health Products & Health Technologies project (Award 72913, the Government of Belgium).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.