ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025
Gauze-soaked with suction wall: An alternative technique for negative pressure wound therapy.
Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Conventional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) machines, such as vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) devices, can be prohibitively expensive for healthcare settings with limited resources. This study investigates the effectiveness of a cost-saving alternative-Gauze-Suction Under Continous (GSUC)-in promoting wound healing when standard NPWT devices are unavailable or unaffordable. Methods: Four patients at Prince Mutaib Bin Abdulaziz Hospital in Al-Jouf, Saudi Arabia, underwent GSUC as part of their wound management under the plastic surgery unit. The primary outcome was the amount of granulation tissue generated, assessing wound readiness for skin grafting, primary closure, delayed primary closure, or secondary intention. Results: All four patients achieved more than 75% granulation tissue coverage in an average of 15.4 days. No wound-related or hospitalization-related complications were observed. Ultimately, all wounds were either successfully grafted or closed primarily. Patient satisfaction was high, and the estimated cost savings reached at least 45% compared with using conventional VAC devices. Conclusion: GSUC is a viable, cost-effective alternative to standard VAC NPWT systems, achieving comparable clinical outcomes at significantly reduced expense. Its adoption may be particularly beneficial in resource-constrained settings seeking to optimize wound care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.