Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510861›Full record

ArticleTrauma surgery & acute care open2025

Gauze-soaked with suction wall: An alternative technique for negative pressure wound therapy.

Rawan Alshammary, Rashed Alshatti, Hameed Humaid, Rahaf Alsubayti, Faris Sultan, Albadawi Hassan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Trauma surgery & acute care open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rawan AlshammaryPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Rashed AlshattiGeneral Surgery, PGY-3 at Riyadh First Health Culster, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-6654-667X
Hameed HumaidPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5432-8752
Rahaf AlsubaytiGeneral Surgery, PGY-3 at Riyadh First Health Culster, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Faris SultanPlastic and Reconstructive Surgery, King Saud University Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-9454-0814
Albadawi HassanPlastic Surgery Unit, Aljouf Health Culster, Sakaka, Aljouf, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Conventional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) machines, such as vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) devices, can be prohibitively expensive for healthcare settings with limited resources. This study investigates the effectiveness of a cost-saving alternative-Gauze-Suction Under Continous (GSUC)-in promoting wound healing when standard NPWT devices are unavailable or unaffordable. Methods: Four patients at Prince Mutaib Bin Abdulaziz Hospital in Al-Jouf, Saudi Arabia, underwent GSUC as part of their wound management under the plastic surgery unit. The primary outcome was the amount of granulation tissue generated, assessing wound readiness for skin grafting, primary closure, delayed primary closure, or secondary intention. Results: All four patients achieved more than 75% granulation tissue coverage in an average of 15.4 days. No wound-related or hospitalization-related complications were observed. Ultimately, all wounds were either successfully grafted or closed primarily. Patient satisfaction was high, and the estimated cost savings reached at least 45% compared with using conventional VAC devices. Conclusion: GSUC is a viable, cost-effective alternative to standard VAC NPWT systems, achieving comparable clinical outcomes at significantly reduced expense. Its adoption may be particularly beneficial in resource-constrained settings seeking to optimize wound care.

Indexed as

burnwounds and injuries

Identifiers

PMID40510861
PMCPMC12161297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.