ArticleAPL bioengineering2025
Evaluation of screw pull-out from plate fixation of en bloc distal radius resection with ulnar reconstruction: Finite element analysis and comparison with experiments on Thiel cadavers.
Article in APL bioengineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fractures of the distal radius often require surgical intervention, with plate fixation being a standard stabilization method. Screw loosening and pull-out propose significant complications, necessitating comprehensive understanding of fixation stability factors. This study introduces a novel approach by the combination of finite element analysis (FEA) and experimental investigations on Thiel cadavers to evaluate screw pull-out behavior from plate fixation in en bloc distal radius resection with ulnar reconstruction. In comparison with previous investigations that used computational modeling or fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens, in the present research, FEA predictions specifically experimentally confirm the usage of Thiel cadavers, which better preserve soft tissue elasticity and hydration, thus more closely reflect
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.