ArticleJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025
Long-Range Forecasting for Emergency Care Systems in a Highly Dynamic Setting: A Singapore Case Study.
Article in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: In aging societies such as Singapore, emergency care systems (ECSs) face the challenge of ever-increasing demand for urgent care. The uncertainties around population aging are compounded by the downstream effects of population health interventions. We forecast the demand for ECS use in Singapore, in terms of emergency department length of stay (ED-LOS) hours per person per year, until 2050, with and without the effects of a major intervention that enhances the role of primary and community care. Methods: Using a system dynamics simulation model, we applied age-specific emergency department usage rates-derived from our analysis of 1,736,405 attendances in a large tertiary hospital and stratified by acuity-to an age-stratified population forecast. We simulated a baseline and 4 intervention scenarios based on different efficacy-time and effect size levels. Results: In the baseline scenario, median ED-LOS increased from 580 hours per 1000 residents per year in 2010 to 644 hours per 1000 residents in 2050. Median ED-LOS increased from 276 to 372 hours per 1000 residents per year for high-acuity patients, whereas it decreased from 302 to 274 hours per 1000 residents per year for low-acuity patients. Under all intervention scenarios, low-acuity ECS use per person decreased, caused by "decanting" of this patient group to primary care. However, high-acuity ECS use per person increased because of longevity. Conclusions: In the long term, an overall increase in ECS demand is driven by an increase in high-acuity use; population health interventions can further exacerbate the high-acuity burden. Our work casts light on the relatively less-studied dynamics of long-term ECS demand.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.