Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510825›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma2025

BROAD SCORE: A tool for assessing reduction quality and predicting functional outcomes in paediatric diaphyseal both-bone forearm fractures.

Binoti Sheth, Kamal Jain, Pankaj Pawar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Binoti ShethDepartment of Orthopaedics, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai, 400022, India.
Kamal JainDepartment of Orthopaedics, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai, 400022, India.
Pankaj PawarDepartment of Orthopaedics, Lokmanya Tilak Municipal Medical College and General Hospital, Sion, Mumbai, 400022, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Conservative management is the gold standard in the treatment of both bone forearm fractures in children. However, the guidelines for the same remain unclear. Acceptability of reduction and its maintenance in a cast are both important aspects of this management. Various casting indices have been described for the latter but no acceptability criterion has been considered as a standard. This study aimed to create a simple scoring system that would guide orthopaedicians in accepting a reduction, making informed decisions and explaining the outcomes to the patient and the caregivers. Methods: 40 children with both bone forearm fractures under the age of 9 were selected according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, closed reduction and above elbow casting was done and the patients prospectively followed up over a period of 1 year. Forearm radiographs were taken and range of motion (Flexion - Extension and Pronation - Supination) was documented at every visit. The BROAD Score (Bowing, Rotation, Overlap, Angulation, Displacement) was calculated at every visit and correlated with the range of motion and functional outcome grade as per Price criteria. Results: 57.5 % of the study population were aged 6-8 years (Male: Female = 5:3). Diaphyseal midshaft fractures were the most common (55 %). In patients with acceptable functional outcome (82.5 %, n = 33), the mean BROAD score immediately post reduction was 4.061 (±0.609), while in those with a fair/poor functional outcome (17.5 %, n = 7), the mean score was 2.643 (±0.626). Conclusion: A BROAD score of at least 3.5 immediate post reduction, with a good casting technique and a meticulous follow up with radiographic evaluation would suffice to result in an acceptable functional outcome, provided there is enough time till skeletal maturity for remodeling. A score less than 3 should encourage the treating orthopaedician to consider re-manipulation in order to achieve a better outcome.

Indexed as

Bone/therapyClinical decision rulesConservative treatmentForearm/injuriesFracturesNonoperative treatmentPediatricsSeverity of Illness indexTreatment outcome

Identifiers

PMID40510825
PMCPMC12158507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.