ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025
Characterization of the salivary microbiome in healthy individuals under fatigue status.
Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pilot Study of Oral Microbiome and Psychoneurological Symptom Cluster in Breast Cancer.Nursing research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & Aims: Limited understanding exists regarding the characteristics and biological significance of the salivary microbiome in healthy individuals experiencing physiological fatigue. This study aimed to delineate the structural and functional alterations in the salivary microbiome of healthy individuals undergoing physiological fatigue compared to energetic controls, and to explore its potential as a biomarker for fatigue status. Methods: A cohort of 7 healthy individuals experiencing acute physiological fatigue (induced by prolonged study and confirmed via electroencephalography; Fatigue group, FTG) and 63 energetic healthy controls (Energetic group, ENG) were enrolled. Saliva samples were collected, from which microbial DNA was extracted. The V3-V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was subsequently sequenced using high-throughput technology. Bioinformatics analyses encompassed assessment of alpha and beta diversity, identification of differential taxa using Linear discriminant analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) with multi-method cross-validation, construction of microbial co-occurrence networks, and screening of fatigue-associated biomarker genera via the Boruta-SHAP algorithm. Microbial community phenotypes and potential functional pathways were predicted using BugBase and PICRUSt2, respectively. Results: The FTG group exhibited significantly diminished alpha diversity (Simpson index, p=0.01071) relative to the ENG group. Beta diversity analysis demonstrated significant dissimilarities in microbial community structure between the groups (p<0.05). Taxonomic profiling revealed a significant enrichment in the relative abundance of potential periodontopathogenic genera, including Conclusion: This study provides novel evidence that physiological fatigue induces significant structural and functional alterations in the salivary microbiome of healthy individuals. These perturbations include diminished microbial diversity, disrupted community architecture, enrichment of potential opportunistic pathogens, and marked shifts in key metabolic pathways, particularly those governing neuroactivity and energy metabolism. These findings suggest that the salivary microbiome may be implicated in the physiological regulation of fatigue, potentially via an "oral-microbiome-brain axis," and underscore its potential as a source of non-invasive biomarkers for assessing fatigue status. Further mechanistic investigations are warranted to elucidate these interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.