Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510797›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2025

Studies on the antibacterial activity of the antimicrobial peptide Mastoparan X against methicillin-resistant

Zhangping Lu, Xiaofang Liang, Wenbo Deng, Qianqian Liu, Yulin Wang, Meng Liu, Fugui Lin, Zhihong Liu, Yu Zhang, Wenjie Wang and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Lauric Acid Microemulsions InhibitFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Bioactive Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized Using EndophyticPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Zhangping Lu *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Xiaofang Liang *Department of Clinical Laboratory, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Wenbo DengDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Qianqian LiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yulin WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Meng LiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Fugui LinDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Zhihong LiuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yu ZhangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Wenjie WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yingying SunDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Yaozhou WuDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.
Lianhua WeiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Methicillin-resistant Methods: Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) of Mastoparan X against MRSA USA300 were determined by microbroth dilution method. The antibacterial activity of Mastoparan X against USA300 was then evaluated by time-growth curves, membrane fluidity, reactive oxygen species(ROS), flow cytometry, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). In addition, the inhibitory and scavenging effects of Mastoparan X on USA300 biofilm were evaluated using crystal violet staining. Finally, gene expression changes in USA300 after treatment with Mastoparan X were analyzed by transcriptomics and verified by RT-qPCR. Results: The MIC and MBC of Mastoparan X on USA300 were 32 μg/mL and 64 μg/mL, respectively. SEM observation showed significant changes in cell morphology after Mastoparan X treatment. Flow cytometry confirmed that Mastoparan X promoted the apoptosis of MRSA cells. In addition, Mastoparan X inhibited the formation of MRSA biofilm while destroying the mature bioepithelia already formed. Transcriptomic analysis showed that 851 genes were significantly altered and ABC transport protein, amino acid biosynthesis, glycolysis and tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle were inhibited after 16μg/mL Mastoparan X treatment. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that Mastoparan X has potent bactericidal activity against MRSA and is expected to provide new potential peptides for the clinical treatment of MRSA.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial PeptidesMethicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureusWasp VenomsBiofilmsGene Expression ProfilingHumansIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrobial ViabilityMicroscopy, Electron, ScanningReactive Oxygen SpeciesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial PeptidesIntercellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsmastoparanReactive Oxygen SpeciesWasp Venomsantimicrobial activityantimicrobial peptidebiofilmMastoparan XMRSAUSA 300

Identifiers

PMID40510797
PMCPMC12159006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.