ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics: X2025
A pragmatic mixing model for the evaluation of powder flow properties of multicomponent pharmaceutical blends.
Article in International journal of pharmaceutics: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Accelerated drug development using a digital formulator and a self-driving tableting data factory.Nature communications · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Maintaining flowability of pharmaceutical blends is critical for operational efficiency in state-of-the-art continuous direct compression (CDC) manufacturing, with poor flow potentially resulting in API loss, increased experimental work and increased time to market. Consequently, flowability is a crucial consideration in the design of formulations and must be considered throughout the development process when changes are introduced. Traditionally, understanding flow properties has required testing large amounts of material, particularly when evaluating formulation options. This has led to research into developing predictive flow models to reduce experimental burden. Current models with good predictive capacity, such as using granular bond number, require non-routine measurements such as mechanical surface energy. Three mixture designs, each using three pharmaceutical materials, were developed to investigate flow properties and allow the evaluation of a number of mixing models for predicting flowability with minimal experimental input requirements. The resultant models ranged in complexity from simple first order mixture models to more complex third order models with binary and ternary interaction parameters. An analysis of the experimental cost versus prediction accuracy suggested that while the more complex models delivered the most accurate predictions, a first order mass weighted model using inverse FFC was capable of providing good predictions in return for a more manageable experimental burden, with an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.