ArticleBMJ public health2025
Experiences of unplanned healthcare encounters from victims of intimate partner violence in Sweden.
Article in BMJ public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Intimate partner violence (IPV) represents a substantial public health concern affecting individuals of all ages and all genders. IPV survivors have a higher healthcare consumption than those not living with IPV. The staff in unplanned healthcare context (such as drop-in primary healthcare or emergency care) care for these persons often, due to different health problems following being an IPV victim. The nature of the unplanned care indicates a lack of continuity in the caring relationship. The aim of the study was to investigate experiences and expectations in the care of adults who had experienced IPV. Methods: The research followed a qualitative design with 11 individual, semistructured interviews, analysed using content analysis. Participants were recruited via social media. Results: 11 interviews revealed the overarching theme 'Being seen without shame or blame', which was based on experiences and expectations of healthcare encounters. Being seen without being shamed or blamed by the healthcare staff was an important factor in making the IPV victim feel safe and experience trust. This theme represents two different perspectives: the categories 'The caring person' and 'The caring organisation'. There is an imbalance regarding gender, meaning that our results may not be valid for male or non-binary IPV victims. Conclusions: In many healthcare encounters in Sweden, nurses are the first healthcare professionals to meet the patient. To enable the IPV victim to share their experience and thus receive better care and support, more knowledge is needed. If the IPV victim does not feel confident that the healthcare staff can handle their disclosure in a professional and empathetic way, patient safety is at great risk.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.