ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Random splicing assisted deep learning for breast cancer cell line classification via Raman spectroscopy.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- FLIM Characterization of Staurosporine-Induced Changes in Endogenous Cellular Autofluorescence.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Raman spectroscopy extracts rich biochemical information on a single cell, demonstrating significant potential for precise cancer identification. While machine learning enhances spectral analysis efficiency, conventional models remain constrained by data volume. Here, we developed Random Splicing-Convolutional Neural Network (RS-CNN), a deep learning framework that addresses data scarcity through spectral concatenation. By randomly splicing Raman spectra from the same cell line, RS-CNN enhances distinctive spectral features while simultaneously expanding dataset size and improving signal quality. Validation across six breast cancer cell lines demonstrated RS-CNN's superiority over five benchmark models (SVM, LDA, PCA-SVM, PCA-LDA, CNN). With 450 spectra per cell line, RS-CNN achieved 98.63 % classification accuracy compared to conventional models' accuracies of around 85 %. Under data-limited conditions (100 spectra/line), RS-CNN maintained 91.47 % accuracy, outperforming CNN's 70.83 %. The RS-CNN's generalizability was further validated by an independently acquired dataset, achieving at least 94 % classification accuracy. SHAP analysis suggested the spectral region around 980 cm⁻¹ was significant for cancer diagnosis, while the 1158-1160 cm⁻¹and 1603-1607 cm⁻¹ regions were particularly valuable for distinguishing between cancer subtypes. These findings establish RS-CNN as a robust analytical model for clinical Raman diagnostics, particularly valuable in applications requiring high accuracy with limited samples.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.