Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510763›Full record

ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025

Graph convolutional neural networks improved target-specific scoring functions for cGAS and kRAS in virtual screening.

Bo Wang, Muhammad Junaid, Wenjin Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bo WangInstitute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Muhammad JunaidInstitute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.
Wenjin LiInstitute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the drug discovery process, traditional structure-based virtual screening methods, such as molecular docking, are often limited by empirical scoring functions. Recent studies have demonstrated that target-specific scoring functions developed using machine learning approaches can enhance the accuracy of virtual screening. Furthermore, the extrapolation performance of these scoring functions is crucial for their broader applicability. Therefore, the study tried combining molecular graph and convolutional neural networks as a way to improve the extrapolation ability of target-specific scoring functions in the face of data expanded within a certain range of chemical space. Taking cGAS and kRAS proteins as examples, through rigorous data screening and feature extraction, the study constructed multiple supervised learning models containing traditional machine learning models, and deep learning models like graph convolutional networks. The results show that compared with the generic scoring functions, these target-specific scoring functions showed significant superiority. In addition, the target-specific scoring functions also exhibit remarkable robustness and accuracy in determining whether a molecule is active. This indicates that the graph convolutional network can be generalized to the prediction of heterogeneous data based on the complex patterns of molecular protein binding that have been learned. The comprehensive performance evaluation of different target-specific scoring functions shows that they hold significant potential for applications in structure-based virtual screening. In particular, graph convolutional networks was demonstrated to greatly improve the screening efficiency and accuracy of target-specific scoring functions for targets such as cGAS and kRAS.

Indexed as

CGASGraph convolutional neural networksKRASScoring functionVirtual screening

Identifiers

PMID40510763
PMCPMC12162078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.