ReviewThe Japanese dental science review2025
Utilization of cellulose nanofiber in dental applications: A systematic review of in vitro evidence.
Review in The Japanese dental science review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Influence of Ageing and Hydrothermal Fatigue (Thermocycling) on Degradation and Fracture Toughness of Light-Cured and Hybrid Resin-Based Nanocomposites (RBCs).Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Mechanical Enhancement for Longevity of Glass Ionomer Cement Using Cellulose Nanocrystals: A Study on Microhardness and Wear Resistance.International journal of dentistry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic review aimed to determine how cellulose nanofiber (CNF) enhance the mechanical properties, biocompatibility, and functional versatility of dental materials, based on in vitro evidence. A systematic review protocol was developed according to PRISMA 2020. The literature search was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase for English-language publications with no date restrictions, yielding 180 publications. After removing duplicates, 150 remained, from which 23 were evaluated in full. 17 in vitro studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 13 had a low risk of bias, 4 had a moderate risk, and none had a high risk. Across all included investigations, CNF consistently improved mechanical performance, particularly flexural and compressive strength, while maintaining or enhancing biocompatibility in various cell culture models. CNF's nanofibrillar structure and modifiable surface chemistry also expanded its functional versatility, enabling applications such as drug encapsulation and targeted antimicrobial delivery. Overall, CNF emerges as a promising biomaterial for modern dentistry, offering superior mechanical reinforcement, favorable cell responses, and wide-ranging functional modifications. Further in vivo research and clinical trials are necessary to confirm its long-term safety and efficacy, thereby facilitating the translation of these in vitro findings into standard dental practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.