Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510747›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2025

Exploring the Nutritional Profile and Cost of Plant-Based Milk Alternatives Compared with Dairy Milk in the UK with Consideration of Environmental Impact Data.

Gemma K Nowson, Rosalind Fallaize, Kate E Earl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gemma K NowsonDepartment of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, School of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Rosalind FallaizeDepartment of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, School of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.
Kate E EarlDepartment of Clinical, Pharmaceutical and Biological Sciences, School of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Plant-based milk alternatives (PBMA) are increasingly popular, driven by medical, environmental, or moralistic reasons or perceived health benefit. Objectives: This study aimed to compare the nutritional profile, cost, and environmental impact of all PBMA and dairy milk (DM) in the United Kingdom. Methods: Nutritional information, ingredients, and cost of PBMA ( Results: PBMA with a similar fat profile to "semi-skimmed" milk had a significantly lower energy content ( Conclusions: PBMA cannot be recommended as a nutritional replacement for DM, due to varying nutritional profiles. However, some PBMA will be more beneficial than others depending on an individual's health needs. Cow milk is cheaper than PBMA. Further understanding of the potential health impacts of consuming PBMA is warranted. There is a need for robust, primary research on the environmental impacts of foods.

Indexed as

dairyenvironmental impactfood compositionfood costmilkmilk alternativesmilk substitutesnutritional profileplant-based milk alternativesultraprocessed foods

Identifiers

PMID40510747
PMCPMC12162003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.