Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510735›Full record

ReviewThe World Allergy Organization journal2025

Biologics in IgE-mediated food allergy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of interventional studies.

Ulugbek B Nurmatov, Lucia Lo Scalzo, Francesca Galletta, Marianna Krasnenkova, Stefania Arasi, Ignacio J Ansotegui, Nara Tagiyeva-Milne, Alessandro Fiocchi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The World Allergy Organization journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Update on biologic and small molecules treatments in pediatric allergic diseases.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Expanding Role of Omalizumab: From Food Allergy to Drug Desensitization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ulugbek B NurmatovDivision of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Wales, UK.
Lucia Lo ScalzoUniversity of Palermo, Italy.
Francesca GallettaUniversity of Messina, Italy.
Marianna KrasnenkovaTashkent Medical Academy, Uzbekistan.
Stefania ArasiPediatric Allergology Unit, Bambino Gesù Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.
Ignacio J AnsoteguiDepartment of Allergy and Immunology, Hospital Quironsalud Bizkaia, Bilbao, Spain.
Nara Tagiyeva-MilneLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine, England, UK.
Alessandro FiocchiPediatric Allergology Unit, Bambino Gesù Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: IgE-mediated food allergy (FA) is a major healthcare problem, affecting millions of children and adults worldwide. FA management usually involves elimination diets; however, there is increasing interest in alternative strategies that enable individualized optimal approaches. Yet, there is little consensus on the optimal strategies for managing FA. This review aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of biologics, including omalizumab (OMA), as monotherapy or in combination with oral immunotherapy (OIT), for FA management. Methods: A systematic review (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) was conducted, searching 10 international electronic databases (from their start to May 2024) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing biologics in FA patients. The outcomes were desensitization, increased tolerated dose of food allergens, sustained unresponsiveness, adverse events/reactions (ARs/AEs), quality of life (QoL) measures, immunological biomarkers, and cost-effectiveness. Data were pooled using random-effects model. The study quality was assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias. Results: We included 11 RCTs, 2 secondary reports from earlier RCTs and 2 US National Clinical Trials with 1010 participants in total. Nine RCTs were at low, 3 at moderate, and 1 at high risk of bias. Meta-analyses demonstrated that OMA significantly improved desensitization rates and increased food tolerance thresholds compared to placebo (risk ratio (RR) 2.035, 95% CI: 1.29 to 3.22 and RR 4.90, 95% CI 2.14 to 11.20, respectively.) OMA reduced the risk of food allergic reactions (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.85) without significantly increasing skin (RR = 1.09, 95% CI 0.45 to 2.65) or other adverse or severe reactions. Immunologic outcomes showed decreased hypersensitivity, a lowered allergic and inflammatory response. QoL measures improved for patients and parents with multifood oral immunotherapy. However, no studies investigated the cost-effectiveness of biologics in FA management. Conclusions: Based on the existing literature and our SR and MA, OMA can be recommended for use in carefully selected patients with IgE-mediated food allergies as monotherapy. However, patient-specific factors need to be addressed to reduce the risk of food-induced allergic reactions. OMA in combination with oral immunotherapy is recommended for cow's milk allergy. For the other foods, it will be recommended based on the results of ongoing, large RCTs in the field of biologics for food allergy. In order to recommend a wider indication for use, more research is needed to evaluate optimal treatment durations, long-term outcomes, and cost-effectiveness.

Indexed as

BiologicsIgE-mediated food allergyInterventional studiesMeta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40510735
PMCPMC12158532

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.