ArticleNational journal of maxillofacial surgery
Evaluation of analgesic efficacy of transdermal patch versus oral diclofenac tablets in orthodontic patients undergoing multiple premolar extractions - A crossover study.
Article in National journal of maxillofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Topical Pain Management: An Updated Review of Current Evidence and Emerging Strategies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Dental pain management in medically compromised patients: A comprehensive review and proposal of an analgesic ladder.Saudi journal of anaesthesiaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: To evaluate and compare analgesic effect of transdermal Diclofenac patch and oral Diclofenac tablet post-orthodontic extraction. Materials and Method: This study was carried out by the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, K M Shah Dental College and Hospital. Thirty-two young pre-orthodontic patients requiring bilateral maxillary and mandibular first premolar extractions were selected for the study. The right maxillary and mandibular first premolars were extracted first and 50 mg oral Diclofenac sodium tablets were prescribed to be taken thrice a day for three days. In the next appointment, the contralateral first premolars were extracted and a 100-mg transdermal Diclofenac patch was applied once a day for three days. Pain relief and pain intensity with both the Diclofenac formulations were recorded for each of the three postoperative days using 5-point verbal pain intensity and pain relief score charts. The patients were evaluated on the day of extraction, one day after extraction and two days after extraction. Results: Statistical analyses revealed that there was a gradual increase in pain relief scores and a gradual decrease in pain intensity scores with the use of oral Diclofenac tablets as well as with the transdermal patch. However, patients reported that they were more comfortable using the transdermal patch particularly due to the once-a-day application and lesser frequency of systemic adverse effects. Conclusion: Transdermal Diclofenac patch provides as potent analgesia as the oral Diclofenac tablets with the added advantage of better patient compliance and may be used for routine post-extraction analgesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.