ArticleNational journal of maxillofacial surgery
Crestal bone loss in partially grafted immediate dental implants with and without use of static magnetic field: An
Article in National journal of maxillofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The use of dental implants is a successful method in modern dentistry for replacing missing teeth. To cater to patients' desire for shorter treatment times, clinicians have explored early or immediate loading of implants shortly after their placement. Implant stability during this period is influenced by multiple factors, including bone density, bone mechanical properties, implant design, edentulous site complications, and surgical technique. Objective: This study aims to investigate whether static magnetic fields (SMFs), generated using safer magnets, can enhance osseointegration, and mitigate crestal bone loss in immediately placed dental implants post-grafting. Materials and Methods: The study involves assessing crestal bone loss in two groups of immediately placed dental implants-one group exposed to an SMF and another group without such exposure. The SMF is generated by safer magnets. Implant stability and crestal bone loss are evaluated as the primary outcomes. The evaluation is conducted at baseline, as well as at intervals of 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after implant placement. Three different examiners perform the measurements to enhance accuracy and reliability. Results: The study's findings provided insights into whether the application of SMFs impacted crestal bone loss during 1 year of follow-up. Comparison between the exposed and nonexposed groups shed light on the potential benefits of utilizing SMFs for enhancing osseointegration and minimizing crestal bone loss. Conclusion: This study's investigation into the effects of SMFs on immediately placed dental implants holds promise for advancing our understanding of techniques to accelerate osseointegration and reduce crestal bone loss.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.