Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510641›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

Life cycle inventory dataset for energy production and storage technologies: Standardized metrics for environmental modeling.

Elena Rozzi, Paolo Marocco, Marta Gandiglio

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elena RozziDepartment of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy.
Paolo MaroccoDepartment of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy.
Marta GandiglioDepartment of Energy, Politecnico di Torino, Corso Duca degli Abruzzi 24, 10129 Torino, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The presented dataset provides the results of a comprehensive inventory of Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) for multiple energy production and storage technologies. Unlike conventional LCA studies, which often provide case-specific data that are difficult to apply in the analysis and design of energy systems, this work delivers standardized values, expressed per unit of installed capacity (kW), and, where relevant, per unit of operational energy output (kWh). These normalized metrics are essential for the integration of environmental considerations into energy system modeling and optimization. The dataset is the result of a comprehensive review of peer-reviewed studies, institutional reports, industrial data, and existing LCA databases. Robust average values were derived by consolidating information from multiple sources, thereby addressing a key gap in the literature whereby heterogeneous and fragmented data can make their practical application problematic. Minimum and maximum estimates are also reported to characterize the variability across technologies and datasets, providing a more comprehensive understanding of the underlying uncertainty. Unlike existing LCA databases, which are often paywalls, and can have highly detailed but less accessible data, this method provides aggregated and user-friendly parameters that are ready for direct use. The inventory covers such technologies as photovoltaic systems, energy storage solutions, hydrogen production, internal combustion engines, boilers, heat pumps, and organic Rankine cycles, as well as energy carriers, including natural gas, electricity, hydrogen, and biomass. Environmental impacts are reported across multiple midpoint categories, such as the global warming potential, mineral and metal depletion, land and water use, particulate matter, acidification, eutrophication, ecotoxicity, ionizing radiation, human toxicity, and the ozone depletion potential. The dataset, which was drawn up according to International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD), ReCiPe Life Cycle Impact Assessment Method (ReCiPe), and Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Global Warming Potential (IPCC GWP) guidelines, ensures consistency and comparability across technologies. Moreover, the dataset, which is provided as an open-access Excel Workbook, is readily applicable to environmental assessments, optimization studies, and energy planning in energy communities and smart grids, to support informed decisions for sustainable energy transitions.

Indexed as

Carbon footprintEnergy communitiesEnergy storageEnvironmental impactLCAMidpoint impactRenewable energy

Identifiers

PMID40510641
PMCPMC12162071

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.