Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510639›Full record

ArticleData in brief2025

An annotated image dataset of urban insects for the development of computer vision and deep learning models with detection tasks.

Min Hui Lim, Hiang Hao Chan, Song-Quan Ong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Min Hui LimInstitute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
Hiang Hao ChanPest Sensei Services, 81550 Johor Bahru, Malaysia.
Song-Quan OngInstitute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Jalan UMS, 88400 Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large image dataset with the aim of developing an insect recognition algorithm like YOLO. The dataset contains more than 25,000 annotations on the taxonomy of urban insects according to their order and the localization of the insect (as a bounding box) on a scanned image. This annotated image dataset of flying insects was collected using UV light traps placed in food warehouses, manufacturers and grocery stores in urban environments. The traps, equipped with UVA lamps (365 nm), captured a variety of insect species on sticky cards over 7-10 days. The sticky traps with all captured insects were used to create high-resolution scanned images (1200 dpi, 48-bit colour), with the resolution preserving fine morphological details of the insect, such as the antenna. To annotate the dataset for computer vision and deep learning models with detection tasks, annotation was performed using CVAT, with bounding boxes labelled by entomology experts at the order level. The dataset was intended to serve as a dataset for computer scientists or entomologists to compare the performance of deep learning models that can be used to build an automatic detection system for urban insect diversity or pest control studies.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceBiodiversityInsect AIIntegrated pest managementUrban entomology

Identifiers

PMID40510639
PMCPMC12159940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.