Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510626›Full record

ArticlemicroPublication biology2025

Extracellular stimulation in neocortex lacks specificity.

Linn K Dragsted, Shawniya Alageswaran, Aparna Suvrathan, P Jesper Sjöström

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in microPublication biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Linn K DragstedBSc Programs in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Shawniya AlageswaranCentre for Research in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Aparna SuvrathanCentre for Research in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
P Jesper SjöströmCentre for Research in Neuroscience, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

By activating axons, extracellular stimulation elicits synaptic responses in patch-clamped cells. However, because axonal signaling is both orthodromic and antidromic, extracellular stimulation may lack specificity. For example, stimulating neocortical layer (L) 4 to recruit ascending inputs to L2/3 pyramidal cells (PCs) may also antidromically activate presynaptic L2/3 PCs, as their descending axons traverse L4. This contaminates L4→L2/3 activation with L2/3→L2/3 responses, which is problematic since these pathways have different properties. Using 2-photon calcium imaging, we found L2/3 PCs that responded to L4 stimulation even after synaptic blockade, demonstrating antidromic activation. Our findings highlight limitations of extracellular stimulation specificity in neocortex.

Identifiers

PMID40510626
PMCPMC12159760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.