ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Drivers and barriers to rural and urban healthcare placement in Ghana: a Delphi study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The African youth in mind (Y-MIND) brief psychological intervention for depression among school-going adolescents in Ghana: a development case series.BMC psychiatry · 2026Trial
- From devolution to post-COVID-19 UHC scoping review of human resource for health reforms in Kenya: a signalling and sensemaking analysis.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
- Trends and inequalities in health facility deliveries among women of reproductive age in Ghana, 1993-2022.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to cervical cancer screening utilization among female healthcare professionals in the Tamale Metropolis.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study explored the level of consensus on the drivers and barriers influencing doctors' decisions to work in rural versus urban areas. The study provides insights into systemic issues affecting healthcare workforce distribution in Ghana. Access to medical care is particularly important given the changing demographics of Ghana, including the growth of the older and chronically ill population and the high proportion of older adults living in rural areas. Methods: A three-round e-Delphi study was conducted among doctors and regional directors of the Ghana Health Service using a seven-point Likert scale. A median score of ≥6 and an interquartile range of ≤1 was used as cutoffs. In total, 47 experts participated in the study. Although 55 initially registered interest, only 47 took part in the first round. By the second and third rounds, 42 experts remained engaged in the study. Results: Experts reached consensus on 40 descriptors (78%), of which 37 (93%) were considered important. Doctors reached consensus on 11 and 7 important drivers and barriers of rural incentive adoption, respectively, while reaching consensus on 8 important drivers of urban incentive factors. Regional directors reached consensus on 4 and 7 important drivers of rural and urban factors, respectively. Four categorical themes emerged from the analysis. These are financial, professional development and career advancement, work-life balance, and community lifestyle factors. Conclusion: The contrast in drivers and barriers between rural and urban healthcare workers necessitates tailored policy approaches, resource allocation strategies, and workforce planning efforts to ensure equitable access and quality care across diverse settings and among different sub-populations, especially the growing number of aged and chronically ill.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.