ArticleAEM education and training2025
Defying the Downtrend: Factors Driving Medical Students to Pursue Emergency Medicine.
Article in AEM education and training, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In recent years, the number of medical students applying to Emergency Medicine (EM) has sharply decreased. Burnout and workforce projections within the specialty have been cited as contributing factors. Counter to this trend, our institution observed a higher percentage of students pursuing EM than the national average each year. This study sought to understand the factors driving these students to pursue EM. Methods: We performed a cross-sectional survey of medical students from our institution who matched into EM from 2022 to 2024. Participants completed an electronic survey about influences on how they learned about EM and on their decision to pursue an EM career. The survey consisted of rating scale and short answer questions. A test of binomial proportions assessed differences between rating scale items using the item with the most positive results as the reference. Short answer responses were grouped into categories and ranked by frequency. Results: A total of 31 of 41 (76%) students responded. The factors found to be most useful for learning about EM as a specialty were "Participation in clinical electives" ( Conclusion: The most influential factors driving our medical students to pursue EM were clinical exposure to EM and individual advising, particularly from EM residents. Focused efforts in these areas are potential strategies for other institutions to foster student interest in EM and counter the national trend.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.