Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510543›Full record

ArticleClinical psychology in Europe2025

Dynamic Complexity of Positive and Negative Affect in NSSI - A Daily Diary Study.

Michaela Bruckbauer-Schwed, Tim Kaiser, Marc Keglevic, Anton-Rupert Laireiter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical psychology in Europe, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michaela Bruckbauer-SchwedDepartment of Psychiatry, Kardinal Schwarzenberg Klinikum, Schwarzach, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8912-3433
Tim KaiserDepartment of Methods and Evaluation / Quality Assurance, Free University Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6307-5347
Marc KeglevicDepartment of Psychiatry, Kardinal Schwarzenberg Klinikum, Schwarzach, Austria.
Anton-Rupert LaireiterDepartment of Psychology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6038-6775

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Non-suicidal self-injury (NSSI) is a major health problem. Functionally, it is related to affect instability and increased affective intensity. The role of negative emotions has already been extensively explored, only few studies have focused on positive emotions. The concept of dynamic complexity (DC) is particularly well suited to differentially analyze the dynamics of affect collected by ecological momentary assessment (EMA). This study examines DC of positive and negative emotions in individuals with and without NSSI history in an EMA setting. Method: Participants from a clinical NSSI group ( Results: Compared to controls, individuals with a history of NSSI showed significantly more positive affect and had significantly higher DC in affect in general. No significant difference for negative affect was found. Conclusion: Our results suggest that it is important to assess dynamic emotional patterns and to analyze in detail the role of positive and negative affect in individuals with NSSI in order to better understand the complex interplay between the different emotional states and to be able to use it for diagnostic purposes and clinical interventions.

Indexed as

affect instabilitydynamic complexityecological momentary assessmentnon-suicidal self-injury (NSSI)positive affect

Identifiers

PMID40510543
PMCPMC12152227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.