Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510464›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2025

Vitamin D for the prevention of diseases in children: A rebuttal to the 2024 Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline.

Benjamin Udoka Nwosu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Benjamin Udoka NwosuDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Pediatrics, Cohen Children's Medical Center, Queens, NY, Northwell Health, and the Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent 2024 Endocrine Society Clinical Practice Guideline on Vitamin D for the prevention of diseases has become a source of controversy among medical professionals and the lay public. This Review rebuts the recommendations from this Guideline for infants, children, adolescents, pregnant women, and dark-skinned individuals. It rejects the one-size-fits-all recommendations and provides the data for precision-medicine-guided vitamin D screening and supplementation in these populations.

Indexed as

EndocrinologyPractice Guidelines as TopicVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyAdolescentChildDietary SupplementsFemaleHumansInfantPregnancySocieties, MedicalVitamin Dchildrendark-skinned peopleguidelinesnewbornpregnant & lactating womenvitamin D

Identifiers

PMID40510464
PMCPMC12158689

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.