ArticleBMJ oncology2025
Mismatch in testing: a retrospective analysis of mismatch repair testing in endometrial cancer and Lynch syndrome diagnosis in multiple specialist centres in the UK and Ireland (March 2022-March 2023).
Article in BMJ oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes from the English National Lynch Syndrome transformation project.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Prognostic Impact of POLE Exonuclease-Domain Mutations in Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Cancers · 2026Review
- Hereditary Endometrial Cancer: Lynch Syndrome, Mismatch Repair Deficiency, and Emerging Genetic Predispositions-A Comprehensive Review with Clinical and Laboratory Guidelines.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Bridging the gap between guidelines and practice in Lynch syndrome screening for endometrial cancer.BMJ oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the implementation of Lynch syndrome testing in endometrial cancer (EC) across the UK and Ireland, identify diagnostic gaps and evaluate adherence to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommending routine mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency testing. Methods and analysis: A multi-centre, cross-sectional retrospective study conducted in line with STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. Secondary care cancer centres across the UK and Republic of Ireland were identified with support from the ARGO (Audit and Research in Gynaecological Oncology) Collaborative and invited to complete a bespoke data collection tool. Results: Data from 2716 histologically confirmed EC cases treated between March 2022 and March 2023 were collected. After excluding misdiagnosed and inconsistent cases, 2549 were analysed. The cohort had a mean age of 66.3 years and a mean body mass index of 33.43 kg/m²; 69.3% had endometrioid EC histology. MMR testing was performed in 91% of cases, with 27.6% classified as MMR deficient, mainly due to MLH1/PMS2 loss (77.4%). Of the 510 cases requiring hypermethylation analysis, results were missing for 62. Of the 181 participants eligible for genetic counselling, 64% were referred and 48% underwent germline testing, identifying 19 new Lynch syndrome cases. MMR-deficient tumours were diagnosed at earlier stages and lower grades compared with MMR-proficient tumours. Conclusions: While tumour based MMR testing is widely performed, diagnostic attrition significantly impairs the pathway to definitive Lynch syndrome diagnosis. Addressing barriers to genetic counselling and germline testing is crucial for improving patient outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of Lynch syndrome screening.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.