Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510444›Full record

ArticleBMJ oncology2025

Mismatch in testing: a retrospective analysis of mismatch repair testing in endometrial cancer and Lynch syndrome diagnosis in multiple specialist centres in the UK and Ireland (March 2022-March 2023).

Neil Ryan, Kane Alexander Lennie, Adam Naskretski, Craig Anderson, Lorena Mihaita, Sanduni Abeysuriya, Maria Ashworth, Victoria Cullimore, Lucy Dobson, Nathan Graham and 25 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

35 authors.

Neil RyanCentre for Reproductive Health, Institute for Regeneration and Repair, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3117-3257
Kane Alexander Lennie *Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Adam Naskretski *Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Craig Anderson *Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Lorena Mihaita *Simpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sanduni Abeysuriya *University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Women's Health Service, London, UK.
Maria Ashworth *Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.
Victoria Cullimore *St Michael's Hospital Gynae Cancer, Bristol, UK.
Lucy Dobson *Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Nathan Graham *Antrim Area Hospital, Antrim, UK.
Radha Graham *University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Women's Health Service, London, UK.
Shaun Haran *Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Zuzanna Holwek *Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK.
Ashton Hunt *Hammersmith Hospitals NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ben Johnston *Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Rebecca Karkia *Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust, Guildford, UK.
Georgios Kouklidis *Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
Elaine Leung *Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK.
Aiste McCormick *Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Josh McMullan *Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Aileen Mohan *Royal United Hospital Bath NHS Trust, Bath, UK.
Alison Montgomery *St Michael's Hospital Gynae Cancer, Bristol, UK.
Claire Newton *St Michael's Hospital Gynae Cancer, Bristol, UK.
Manolis Nikolopoulos *Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
Catriona Norden *Craigavon Area Hospital Group Trust, Portadown, UK.
Charlotte Nott *Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Gemma Owens *Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, UK.
Phillip Rolland *Cheltenham General Hospital, Cheltenham, UK.
Sammuel Ricketts *Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Vanitha Sivalingam *Liverpool Women's Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
David Smith *Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Freweini Tesfai *University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Women's Health Service, London, UK.
Laura Tookman *Medical Oncology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK.
Chenai Whacha *Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Poole, UK.
Peter SandersonSimpson Centre for Reproductive Health, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the implementation of Lynch syndrome testing in endometrial cancer (EC) across the UK and Ireland, identify diagnostic gaps and evaluate adherence to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines recommending routine mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency testing. Methods and analysis: A multi-centre, cross-sectional retrospective study conducted in line with STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. Secondary care cancer centres across the UK and Republic of Ireland were identified with support from the ARGO (Audit and Research in Gynaecological Oncology) Collaborative and invited to complete a bespoke data collection tool. Results: Data from 2716 histologically confirmed EC cases treated between March 2022 and March 2023 were collected. After excluding misdiagnosed and inconsistent cases, 2549 were analysed. The cohort had a mean age of 66.3 years and a mean body mass index of 33.43 kg/m²; 69.3% had endometrioid EC histology. MMR testing was performed in 91% of cases, with 27.6% classified as MMR deficient, mainly due to MLH1/PMS2 loss (77.4%). Of the 510 cases requiring hypermethylation analysis, results were missing for 62. Of the 181 participants eligible for genetic counselling, 64% were referred and 48% underwent germline testing, identifying 19 new Lynch syndrome cases. MMR-deficient tumours were diagnosed at earlier stages and lower grades compared with MMR-proficient tumours. Conclusions: While tumour based MMR testing is widely performed, diagnostic attrition significantly impairs the pathway to definitive Lynch syndrome diagnosis. Addressing barriers to genetic counselling and germline testing is crucial for improving patient outcomes and the cost-effectiveness of Lynch syndrome screening.

Indexed as

Genetic markersImmunotherapyUterine cancer

Identifiers

PMID40510444
PMCPMC12161352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.