ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2025
Twenty Years of "Occasional" Reconstructive Microsurgery: A Retrospective Review of a Single Surgeon's Experience.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Microsurgical free flap reconstruction is a highly technical surgery, usually performed in high-volume specialized centers. During the last 20 years, we had to perform occasional microsurgical reconstructions in our plastic surgery department where general and aesthetic plastic surgery is the main activity. The aim of the study was to review the results of our microsurgical activity and compare it with the results published by high-volume microsurgical centers. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all our microsurgical free flap reconstructions from 2004 to 2024. We collected from the files all the data concerning demographics, indications, flaps used, technical details, complications, and final outcomes. Results: Seventy-one patients were included in the study, with a total of 77 flaps. Patients' age ranged from 7 to 82 years. The operative site was the head and neck in 66 cases, the lower limb in 9 cases, and the abdominal wall in 2 cases. The most frequently used flaps were the latissimus dorsi flap (24 flaps), the radial forearm flap (23 flaps), and the fibula flap (16 flaps). Anastomoses were done mainly under loupe magnification. Ten flaps presented signs of vascular compromise. Salvage rate after confirmed vascular thrombosis was 60%. A total of 4 flaps were lost (94.8% success rate). Conclusions: Provided that some precautions are respected, "occasional microsurgery" can have success rates comparable to high-volume microsurgery centers. It can save lives and improve the patients' quality of life, and it does not prevent the surgeon from pursuing a normal general and aesthetic plastic surgery career.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.