ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2025
Machine Learning-Driven COVID-19 Hospitalization Forecasting: From Theory to Practice in a Major Northeastern Academic Medical Center.
Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Predicting seasonal and emerging waves of respiratory viruses is crucial for effective public health responses. Despite significant efforts in developing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) forecast models, there remains a need for improvement in model performances. Methods: We developed and evaluated a machine learning model to forecast COVID-19 hospitalizations by extending the Neural Basis Expansion Analysis for Time Series Forecasting (N-BEATS) architecture. Specifically, we integrated a temporal convolutional network to incorporate exogenous variables and added additional residual blocks to create a variance-forecasting network component for probabilistic predictions. We compared the performance of our model to the ensemble models from the COVID-19 Forecast Hub. Additionally, we implemented the model in a large academic medical center, applying transfer learning to adapt the model to local hospitalization data. Results: Our model demonstrated a 34.0% improvement in mean absolute error over the performance-weighted ensemble and 37.0% over the unweighted ensemble in predicting total US hospitalizations. Similar trends were obtained using mean absolute percent error and symmetric mean absolute percent error. In a real-world implementation, the model provided actionable forecasts for hospital leadership to optimize resource allocation and surge preparation. Conclusions: The enhanced architecture significantly improves the forecasting of COVID-19 hospitalizations, particularly in anticipating peaks and resurgences. Its successful implementation in a hospital system highlights its potential for aiding decision-making and resource planning during pandemics and other respiratory disease outbreaks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.