Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510378›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2025

Insect meals in cat diets and their effects on digestibility, physiology, and gut microbiota.

Karen Guttenkunst Lisenko, Flavia Maria de Oliveira Borges Saad, Maiara Rodrigues Duarte Oliveira, Thaiane Vieira da Silva, Daniel Souza Dias, Luiz Duarte de Oliveira, Sudário Roberto Silva Júnior, Júlio Cézar Dos Santos Nascimento, Apolônio Gomes Ribeiro, Márcio Gilberto Zangeronimo and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cockroaches as an Emerging Invertebrate Model in Bioscience Research:Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Review
  2. Toxicology research · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Karen Guttenkunst LisenkoDepartment of Animal Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Campus Universitário, Lavras, Brazil.
Flavia Maria de Oliveira Borges SaadDepartment of Animal Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Campus Universitário, Lavras, Brazil.
Maiara Rodrigues Duarte OliveiraDepartment of Animal Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Campus Universitário, Lavras, Brazil.
Thaiane Vieira da SilvaDepartment of Animal Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Campus Universitário, Lavras, Brazil.
Daniel Souza DiasDepartment of Animal Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Campus Universitário, Lavras, Brazil.
Luiz Duarte de OliveiraDepartment of Animal Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Campus Universitário, Lavras, Brazil.
Sudário Roberto Silva JúniorDepartment of Animal Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Campus Universitário, Lavras, Brazil.
Júlio Cézar Dos Santos NascimentoAnimal Science Department, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Recife, Brazil.
Apolônio Gomes RibeiroAnimal Science Department, Universidade Federal da Paraíba, Areia, Brazil.
Márcio Gilberto ZangeronimoDepartment of Animal Sciences, Federal University of Lavras, Campus Universitário, Lavras, Brazil.
Diego Vicente da CostaAgricultural Sciences Institute, Campus Regional de Montes Claros, Federal University of Minas Gerais, Montes Claros, Brazil.
Lucas Rannier Ribeiro Antonino CarvalhoDepartment of Physiology and Pharmacology, Stockholm Sweden Biomedicum, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maria Regina Cattai de GodoyDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Insects are a valuable source of nutrients, but little is known about their nutritional value for companion animals. In this study, we evaluated the inclusion of three insect meals in cat diets (Cinerea cockroach, CC; Madagascar cockroach, MC; and Superworm, SW) at two different levels (7.5 and 15%) on apparent digestibility coefficient (ADC), blood parameters, fecal pH, short-chain fatty acids (SCFA), branched-chain fatty acids (BCFA), phenol and indole production, and gut microbiota during six experimental periods of 15 days each. No differences were found for ADC, except for chitin in which MC registered the highest ADC. The fermentative product analysis showed that propionate displayed higher abundance in all insect treatments compared to the control group. Moreover, cats fed CC diet resulted in higher fecal butyrate while higher 4-methylphenol was registered in cats fed MC and SW diets. No significant differences were found for fecal pH and score, as well as no change in urea, creatinine, and blood count were registered. No differences were registered for total fecal SCFA, BCFA, phenol, and indole production compared to the control group or between insect meal fed groups. The fecal microbiota analyzed by gene 16S rRNA sequencing of cats did not register differences in alpha or beta diversity. In conclusion, dietary inclusion of insect meal up to 15% is a suitable alternative food for adult cats.

Indexed as

digestibilitydomestic catinsectsmicrobiotapet nutrition

Identifiers

PMID40510378
PMCPMC12158984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.