ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Prognostic value of nine inflammatory biomarkers for critically ill patients with rheumatic heart disease: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prognostic value of 9 immune-inflammatory markers for patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: A retrospective study.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Inflammatory and hormonal crosstalk linking rheumatic fever to chronic valvular heart disease.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Predictive value of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio for new-onset atrial fibrillation after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Observational
- Exploring the Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio for Risk Stratification in Heart Failure: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Among various inflammatory biomarkers, the prognostic value in critically ill patients with rheumatic heart disease (RHD) remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the prognostic value of different inflammatory biomarkers in patients with RHD. Methods: This study identified critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database (MIMIC-IV). Nine systemic inflammatory biomarkers, derived from various combinations of neutrophils, lymphocytes, monocytes, and platelets, were evaluated for their association with 30-day all-cause mortality. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify the most predictive biomarker. Furthermore, Cox proportional hazards regression and restricted cubic spline analysis were employed to evaluate the association between the optimal biomarker and survival outcomes. Results: A total of 1002 patients with RHD were included. Eight inflammatory biomarkers were predictive for 30-day all-cause mortality and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) demonstrated the highest area under the curve value of 0.794 among these biomarkers. Then patients were divided into tertiles based on PLR. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis demonstrated that an elevated PLR was significantly associated with increased 30-day all-cause mortality. After adjustment for potential confounders, elevated PLR remained an independent predictor of mortality (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.53; 95% confidence interval: 1.87-3.42; p < 0.001). Furthermore, restricted cubic spline analysis revealed a progressively increasing risk of all-cause mortality with higher PLR levels. Conclusion: These findings indicate that the PLR may be a useful indicator for evaluating the severity and guiding the treatment of RDH patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.