Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510308›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical physics & engineering2025

Training Set Design for Uneven Illumination Correction in High-Resolution Whole Slide Images.

Sama Nemati, Hasti Shabani, Ahmad Mahmoudi-Aznaveh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical physics & engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sama NematiInstitute of Medical Science and Technology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Hasti ShabaniInstitute of Medical Science and Technology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
Ahmad Mahmoudi-AznavehCyberspace Research Institute, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uneven illumination correction is considered a critical pre-processing step in creating digital images from optical microscopes, particularly in whole-slide imaging (WSI). While deep learning-based methods have suggested new possibilities, they often struggle with generalizing to unseen images and require substantial computational resources. The most common approach for training deep neural networks in this field relies on patch-based processing, which may overlook the global illumination distribution, leading to inconsistencies in correction. This study aimed to identify a key limitation in deep learning models for uneven illumination correction, highlighting the importance of preserving the original image resolution and incorporating a global view of illumination patterns to enhance generalization. To address this, we proposed a new training set design strategy that optimizes neural network performance while utilizing computational resources effectively. Our approach ensures a more uniform correction across entire WSI slides, reducing artifacts and improving image consistency. The proposed strategy enhances model robustness and scalability, making deep learning-based illumination correction more practical for clinical and research applications.

Indexed as

ArtifactsDeep LearningPathologyTraining SetUneven Illumination Correction

Identifiers

PMID40510308
PMCPMC12153481

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.