ArticleJournal of hand and microsurgery2025
Microsurgical resection of tenosynovial giant cell tumor in the digits microsurgery for digital GCT.
Article in Journal of hand and microsurgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Knowledge map of recurrence in tenosynovial giant cell tumor: a bibliometric analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TGCT) is a benign tumor arising from the synovial tissue and frequently occur in the digits. The treatment is surgical excision, but a high local recurrence rate is reported. The utilization of the surgical microscope during resection of digital TGCTs appears to be beneficial for more detailed visualization. We presented the outcomes of microsurgical resection of TGCT and discussed how to prevent recurrence of TGCT. Methods: We reviewed 34 consecutive patients with TGCT cases operated by the single operator. The age at surgery ranged from 9 to 77 years, with an average of 48. The most common affected digit was the thumb (n = 13). In all cases, an operating microscope was utilized. The postoperative follow-up period was an average of 27.6 months. Results: Intraoperative findings with the use of a microscope revealed an unexpectedly large number of cases with continuity to the adjacent joints. In cases of joint invasion, the capsule was opened to directly visualize the inside of the joint, and intra-articular tumor was resected enbloc together with extra-articular components. The classification of the disease was mixed type in 17 digits, localized type in 17. Postoperative recurrence was found in only one case (2.9 %). Conclusion: Microsurgery may be a beneficial tool for TGCT resection, but there have been only few reports. Invasive TGCT into the volar plate or infiltrating into the bone near the tendon attachment are well visualized and could be more certainly resected. The recurrence rate after microscopic TGCT resection was only 2.9 %, which is probably the lowest rate in the previously reported literature. Microsurgery allows sufficient visualization of the TGCT invasion and is useful for dissection of digital nerves and arteries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.