ArticleThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2025
Survey of antimicrobial prescribing practices across western Canadian beef cow-calf veterinarians.
Article in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study was to determine if the prescribing practices of western Canadian beef cow-calf veterinarians changed after Canada revised federal regulations in 2018 to require veterinary prescriptions for all medically important veterinary antimicrobials. Animals: Beef cattle, cow-calf. Procedure: An electronic survey was used to capture onboarding of new clients and to record herd health information, dispensing of antimicrobials after hours, reported client concerns with the regulation changes, and basic veterinary practitioner demographics such as province of licensure and number of years in practice. Seventy-two western Canadian veterinarians completed the survey in the winter of 2024. Results: After 2018, the frequency of onboarding of new clients increased, as did herd health data capture. Most participants (80%) reported spending more time supporting client needs for antimicrobial prescriptions after 2018, with 63% reporting more beef cow-calf clients needing this service and 39% reporting the acquisition of new beef cow-calf clients. Billing for onboarding as professional time increased after 2018 but the relative frequencies of methods for dispensing antimicrobials after hours did not change. Changes in prescribing veterinary antimicrobials after 2018 included a decrease in sulfonamides and increases in tetracyclines and phenicols. Reported changes in client antimicrobial use included decreases in penicillin and sulfonamides and increases in phenicols and macrolides. Conclusion and clinical relevance: Although veterinarians reported challenges in meeting client needs and complying with the regulatory change, their comments were largely neutral to positive regarding the effect of the changes. Suggestions from veterinarians included the development of tools to support prescribing and to track client antimicrobial inventory, client antimicrobial use, and disease incidence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40510287PMC12152685What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.