Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510287›Full record

ArticleThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2025

Survey of antimicrobial prescribing practices across western Canadian beef cow-calf veterinarians.

Barbara Wilhelm, Jayce Fossen, Colleen Pollock, Cheryl Waldner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Barbara WilhelmBig Sky Health Analytics, Vermilion, Alberta T9X 2B3 (Wilhelm); Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4 (Fossen, Pollock, Waldner).
Jayce FossenBig Sky Health Analytics, Vermilion, Alberta T9X 2B3 (Wilhelm); Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4 (Fossen, Pollock, Waldner).
Colleen PollockBig Sky Health Analytics, Vermilion, Alberta T9X 2B3 (Wilhelm); Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4 (Fossen, Pollock, Waldner).
Cheryl WaldnerBig Sky Health Analytics, Vermilion, Alberta T9X 2B3 (Wilhelm); Department of Large Animal Clinical Sciences, Western College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, 52 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan S7N 5B4 (Fossen, Pollock, Waldner).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study was to determine if the prescribing practices of western Canadian beef cow-calf veterinarians changed after Canada revised federal regulations in 2018 to require veterinary prescriptions for all medically important veterinary antimicrobials. Animals: Beef cattle, cow-calf. Procedure: An electronic survey was used to capture onboarding of new clients and to record herd health information, dispensing of antimicrobials after hours, reported client concerns with the regulation changes, and basic veterinary practitioner demographics such as province of licensure and number of years in practice. Seventy-two western Canadian veterinarians completed the survey in the winter of 2024. Results: After 2018, the frequency of onboarding of new clients increased, as did herd health data capture. Most participants (80%) reported spending more time supporting client needs for antimicrobial prescriptions after 2018, with 63% reporting more beef cow-calf clients needing this service and 39% reporting the acquisition of new beef cow-calf clients. Billing for onboarding as professional time increased after 2018 but the relative frequencies of methods for dispensing antimicrobials after hours did not change. Changes in prescribing veterinary antimicrobials after 2018 included a decrease in sulfonamides and increases in tetracyclines and phenicols. Reported changes in client antimicrobial use included decreases in penicillin and sulfonamides and increases in phenicols and macrolides. Conclusion and clinical relevance: Although veterinarians reported challenges in meeting client needs and complying with the regulatory change, their comments were largely neutral to positive regarding the effect of the changes. Suggestions from veterinarians included the development of tools to support prescribing and to track client antimicrobial inventory, client antimicrobial use, and disease incidence.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective AgentsCattle DiseasesDrug PrescriptionsPractice Patterns, Physicians'VeterinariansAnimalsCanadaCattleFemaleHumansMaleSurveys and QuestionnairesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agents

Identifiers

PMID40510287
PMCPMC12152685

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.