ArticleThe Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne2025
Communication skills of veterinary practitioners in Türkiye.
Article in The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The objective was to assess communication skills of veterinary practitioners in Türkiye and to examine influences of sociodemographic characteristics on these skills. Participants: A total of 615 actively employed veterinary practitioners were recruited. Procedure: The study population comprised veterinarians actively engaged in clinics, polyclinics, or animal hospitals in Türkiye. The Communication Skills Inventory, consisting of 45 items and 3 sub-factors, was used as the data collection tool. Visits were conducted across 14 selected provinces representing 7 geographical regions of Türkiye. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 615 veterinary practitioners and data were collected during sessions averaging 25 min in duration. Results: In this study, 68.1% of the participants were male, 56.1% were between 23 and 33 y old, 23.6% were employed in the Marmara region, 29.8% had been active in clinical practice for < 5 y, and 75.3% were working primarily with pets. In addition, 81.8% had not received communication training, 92.8% lacked ethics training, and 93.3% were not affiliated with professional organizations. The average total score of veterinarians from the Communication Skills Inventory consisting of 45 items and 3 factors was (mean ± SD) 148.6 ± 11.2 points; therefore, communication skills of these veterinarians were generally at a good level. Conclusion and clinical relevance: Parameters other than gender influenced the communication skills of veterinary practitioners. Communication-skills scores were higher among those serving the pet group, those with < 5 y of active clinical experience, individuals aged 23 to 33 y, and those who had received communication and ethics training and were actively involved in professional organizations. To identify specific factors influencing communication skills of veterinary practitioners and to implement practices based on the findings, qualitative research is recommended. Such studies should include not only veterinary practitioners but also animal owners and veterinary team members with whom they interact.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40510274PMC12152686What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.