Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40510211›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025

Evaluation of vascular cognitive impairment and identification of imaging markers using machine learning: a multimodal MRI study.

Haoying He, Dongwei Lu, Sisi Peng, Jiu Jiang, Fan Fan, Dong Sun, Tianqi Sun, Zhipeng Xu, Ping Zhang, Xiaoxiang Peng and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The enigma of vascular dementia: current state and emerging perspectives.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Haoying He *Department of Neurology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Dongwei Lu *Department of Neuropsychology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Sisi PengDepartment of Neuropsychology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Jiu JiangElectronic Information School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Fan FanDepartment of Neurology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Dong SunDepartment of Neurology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Tianqi SunDepartment of Neurology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Zhipeng XuDepartment of Neuropsychology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Ping ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xiaoxiang PengDepartment of Neurology, Third People's Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan, China.
Ming LeiDepartment of Neurology, General Hospital of the Yangtze River Shipping, Wuhan, China.
Junjian ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vascular cognitive impairment (VCI) is prevalent but underdiagnosed due to its heterogeneous nature and the lack of reliable diagnostic tools. Machine learning (ML) enhances disease evaluation by enabling accurate prediction and early detection from complex data. This study aimed to develop ML models to detect VCI using clinical data and multimodal MRI, and to explore the associations between imaging markers and cognitive function. Methods: The study enrolled 313 participants from Wuhan and surrounding areas, including 157 patients with VCI (age 62.38 ± 6.62 years, education 10.83 ± 3.00 years) and 156 cognitively normal individuals with vascular risk factors (age 59.93 ± 6.74 years, education 13.97 ± 3.19 years). An independent dataset of 82 participants was used for external validation. Clinical data, neuropsychological assessments, and MRIs (T1, T2-FLAIR, and DTI) were collected. After imaging processing and preliminary model selection, optimal models using various data modalities were constructed. Model reduction was undertaken to simplify models without sacrificing performance. SHapley Additive exPlanations and moDel Agnostic Language for Exploration and eXplanation were used for model interpretation. Results: The comprehensive final model integrating clinical and multimodal MRI measures achieved the best performance with eight input variables (AUC of 0.956, 95%CI 0.919-0.988 for internal and 0.919, 95%CI 0.866-0.966 for external validation). During external validation, DTI demonstrated more stable performance than T1 and T2-FLAIR imaging, highlighting its potential importance over conventional imaging markers. Key imaging markers, especially along the lateral cholinergic pathway, were highlighted for their importance in diagnosing VCI and understanding its manifestation. Conclusion: Our study developed and validated accurate ML models for VCI detection, emphasizing the importance of DTI. The identified imaging markers, particularly those derived from DTI, underscoring the potential in enhancing diagnostic accuracy and understanding cognitive impairments related to vascular changes.

Indexed as

diffusion tensor imagingimaging markermachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingvascular cognitive impairment

Identifiers

PMID40510211
PMCPMC12158719

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.