ArticleiScience2025
Gut microbiome signatures predict 5-ASA efficacy in ulcerative colitis.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Fecal microbiota transplantation for the decolonization of mucosal adherent-invasive Escherichia coli in Crohn's disease: an open-label pilot study.Nature communications · 2026Trial
- Recent advances and clinical relevance of microbiome dynamics in health and disease.Gut microbes · 2026Review
- From Multi-Omics to Molecular Causality: A Five-Tier Evidence Framework for the Single-Bacterium-Metabolite Axis in IBD.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Probiotic drug interactions in ulcerative colitis: a microbiota and metabolite perspective.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Understanding Therapeutic Effects of Distinct Molecular Inhibitors as the Key to Current and Future Advanced Therapeutic Strategies.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Oral microbiome and inflammatory bowel disease: New understanding and call to action.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ulcerative colitis (UC) prevalence is rising globally, yet fewer than 50% of patients achieve mucosal healing (MH) with first-line 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) therapy. We aimed to identify microbial signatures that could predict the treatment efficacy of 5-ASA. Active UC patients on standardized 5-ASA treatment were prospectively enrolled. Shotgun metagenomic sequencing was performed to identify the taxonomic and functional profiles before and after treatment. Six species were enriched in the effective group and 3 species in the ineffective group at baseline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.