ReviewCureus2025
A Systematic Review on the Role of Surgical Drains in Vascular Surgery.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Surgical drains are commonly used in vascular surgery to control fluid buildup and reduce postoperative complications; however, their overall benefit remains uncertain due to inconsistent findings and the absence of standardized guidelines. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the role of surgical drains in vascular procedures such as carotid endarterectomy, aortic aneurysm repair, and peripheral arterial bypass, particularly in relation to complications, wound healing, length of hospital stay, and patient recovery. A comprehensive search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Google Scholar, following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort, and case-control studies that reported on relevant clinical outcomes. Nine studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings revealed mixed results regarding the effectiveness of drains in reducing complications such as hematoma and bleeding, with some benefits noted in specific patient populations. However, an increased risk of surgical site infections was frequently observed with drain use. In certain procedures, such as abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, drains may help prevent the increase in postoperative intra-abdominal pressure, although their influence on overall recovery remains unclear. Given these variable outcomes, the routine use of surgical drains in vascular surgery cannot be universally recommended. Instead, their application should be tailored based on individual patient risk factors and the complexity of the surgical procedure. Additional high-quality studies are needed to develop clear, evidence-based guidelines for their use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.