ReviewCureus2025
Long-Term Outcomes of Rituximab Therapy in Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A pilot study on the efficacy and mechanism of telitacicept in systemic lupus erythematosus with antiphospholipid syndrome.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA) represents a difficult blood condition that researchers are now positive about treating with rituximab. A systematic review together with a meta-analysis presents findings about rituximab's effectiveness and safety as a treatment against conventional therapy among patients. Data selection occurred through MEDLINE and Embase, along with the Cochrane Library, while the study only accepted research pairing rituximab treatment with traditional AIHA control techniques. The analysis of the study incorporated 10 high-quality research papers to understand patient data, along with ADAMTS13 activity measurements, therapeutic responses, and treatment results. Available results show that rituximab achieves superior outcomes by enhancing remission rates and minimizing plasma exchange requirements together with reduced relapse frequencies during administration through two different protocols at 375 mg/m² weekly for four weeks or 1000 mg in two doses. Results showed that rituximab treatment enabled higher ADAMTS13 activity values, while patients needed fewer plasma exchange procedures when compared to patients who received standard therapy. Steroid use persisted while healthcare providers administered intravenous immunoglobulin and immunosuppressant medications to particular patient groups. Many studies show that rituximab generates prolonged remission benefits and keeps patients safe from adverse effects. Detailed randomized controlled trials need to proceed because treatment designs conflict and patient profiles vary between studies. The review demonstrates that rituximab functions as an effective treatment alternative for AIHA patients who demonstrate positive outcomes and show potential for wider clinical use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.