ArticleCureus2025
Safety and Efficacy of Atropine 0.05% Versus 0.01% for Prevention of Myopic Progression in Indian Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Efficacy of 0.01% atropine for myopia control in children: an artificial intelligence-assisted multivariate Bayesian meta-analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Low-Concentration Atropine (0.01%, 0.025%, 0.05%) for Myopia Progression in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Ocular Alignment and Strabismus-Related Findings Associated with Low-Dose Atropine for Myopia Control in Children: A Structured Narrative Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 0.01% and 0.05% atropine eye drops in managing myopia progression in children compared to a placebo. Methods This randomized, interventional study was conducted from March 2022 to May 2023 at the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bibinagar, Telangana. A total of 272 children aged five to 16 years, with myopia ranging from -1.0 D to -6.0 D and an annual progression greater than 0.5 D, were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to three groups: Group A (n=88, atropine 0.01%), Group B (n=90, atropine 0.05%), and Group C (n=94, placebo). Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations, including cycloplegic refraction, axial length measurement, and fundus evaluation, were performed at baseline, six weeks, 12 weeks, and at the end of one year. Changes in refractive error, axial length, accommodation, and pupil size were analyzed. Results Both atropine treatments were effective in slowing myopia progression compared to the placebo. Atropine 0.05% significantly reduced refractive progression (0.263 ± 0.03 D) and axial elongation (0.138 ± 0.22 mm) compared to the placebo group (0.759 ± 0.8 D and 0.367 ± 0.33 mm, respectively). The 0.01% atropine group also demonstrated a reduction, although less pronounced (0.319 ± 0.05 D and 0.241 ± 0.22 mm, respectively). Both atropine groups exhibited an increase in the near point of accommodation and pupil size, with the 0.05% group showing more significant changes. Mild adverse effects, including near vision difficulties and photophobia, were reported but did not significantly impact patient compliance. Conclusion Atropine 0.05% is more effective than 0.01% atropine and placebo in slowing myopia progression in children. Although both concentrations led to increased near point of accommodation and pupil size, side effects were mild and well-tolerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.